The economy

Tasmania’s economy is critically oil dependent. ‘Relocalisation’ will be the key to economic sustainability in a carbon constrained future.

In March Peak Oil Tasmania was pleased to co-host a visit to Tasmania by Canadian writer and systems analyst Nicole Foss, who presented at two lively lectures in Hobart and Launceston. Foss has become an expert in the complex global financial and energy systems and focuses a lot of her work on the pressing problem of oil depletion.

Thanks to Hobart climate science writer, Peter Boyer, below is his overview of what Nicole had to say:


Looking the future in the eye

by Peter Boyer

“The chances of us getting through the next decade without significant economic damage are zero”…Nicole Foss [27 May 2012 | Peter Boyer]

Everyone, I’m sure, agrees that some big changes lie ahead. Climate and energy are in the mix, as are governments and economies. All very important, but I reckon that your central concern is much closer to home.

I’m guessing that when you think about your future, uppermost in your mind (as in mine) is the physical and financial wellbeing of you and those close to you. The neighbourhood we call home and the people we share it with remain our principal focus. It’s part of being human.

In tough times our home focus is stronger than ever. This was brought home to me in Hobart earlier this month when a softly-spoken Canadian named Nicole Foss held listeners spellbound as she mapped out her vision of where our current global financial difficulties are taking us.

Foss, who writes under the name Stoneleigh on the blogsite The Automatic Earth, has a background in biology, pollution control, finance and international law — a pretty clear pointer to a mind that ranges far and wide. In that respect at least, she didn’t disappoint her two Tasmanian audiences.

Foss provided a pretty full run-down of what it takes to develop resilience to future shock. She might have added one more item — sitting through one of her lectures without collapsing in utter despair. Even if you take on board only a small part of her message, this is pretty tough medicine.

Here’s a sampler of what she had to say:

    • The world is now experiencing the biggest financial bubble in history. In keeping with the size of the bubble, its inevitable bursting will bring on a major depression and an energy crisis.

    • Markets are neither rational nor efficient, and are driven by perception, not reality. Prices are determined not by any economic fundamentals but simply by what people are prepared to pay.

    • Emotions are catching. When markets are steeply rising we tend to be euphoric; when they’re collapsing we’re driven by fear. Fear being a very sharp emotion, in the wake of a burst bubble we get an extremely rapid decline. That means we’re headed for the worst crash in history.

    • It’s already begun. With those at the top of the financial food chain grabbing for their share of collateral, we’re seeing a spread of fear, which will increase sharply in the next few years. In these circumstances, public policy gets completely overtaken by events.

    • Credit (currently 95 per cent of the total money supply) is the main driver of today’s bubble. Where it once boosted GDP by supporting productive business, credit has been used for personal luxuries or for gambling on market futures, while creating the illusion that this is real wealth.

    • The credit bubble is something like a giant game of musical chairs where there’s one chair to every 100 people. So long as the music keeps playing we don’t notice the acute chair deficit. When it stops, only those best positioned to understand the rules of the game will remain viable.

    • While Australia has a low public debt to GDP ratio, its household and financial institution debt burden is among the highest in the world as a proportion of GDP, which makes it more vulnerable than we might think to a credit crunch.

    • The global energy market did not trigger this crisis, but it will play a big part in its aftermath. Financial disruption will see spikes in oil prices, adding to general volatility. In the longer term, as oil extraction becomes more expensive, oil shortages will make economic recovery more difficult.

    • The scale of the present financial crisis is beyond the capacity of governments and financial institutions to resolve. While they will seek to retain central control, inevitably it will devolve to regional and smaller units as global trade slows and local resources take on greater value.

    • We need to resist the urge to blame someone else, and to think constructively about how we can best manage this situation for both our personal benefit and — just as important — the benefit of our communities.

    • This brings opportunities to foster a more decentralised economy, drawing more on local skills and resources and less dependent on large-scale trade or government programs.

    • In doing so we must work with others, because we cannot get through the coming hard times alone, and that brings numerous benefits. We don’t have to live like kings or queens; in living a simpler life, more focused on community, we can rediscover what it means to be human.

There are some caveats to all this. Though a long-time student of global finance, Foss is neither an economist nor a psychologist. Professionals in either of these fields, and no doubt many others, may thus conclude that she doesn’t know what she’s talking about.

We should be careful about such conclusions. Any wise economist or psychologist will tell you that our future economic and social wellbeing involves understanding well beyond the scope of any particular profession’s tools of trade. Foss has much to contribute to this complex debate.


(Peter Boyer writes a weekly climate education column in the Hobart Mercury and manages the website Climate Tasmania. Foss’s visit was co-hosted by UTAS Sustainability and Peak Oil Tasmania. See HERE for background notes on Nicole Foss.) You can listen to a local radio interview (106.5 FM) HERE.


For those interested, we recorded the question and answer section here: This runs for an hour so sit back!

By Dirk Reiser

How will Peak Oil impact upon Tasmania’s high profile tourism industry and all those stakeholders who depend on tourism for their livelihoods?

The Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010) defines a visitor as ‘a person taking a trip to a destination outside their usual environment for business, leisure or other personal purposes’. From this definition it becomes clear that a visitor has to move away from their home. In the majority of cases, fossil fuels are used to do this.

The aviation industry alone consumes 243 million tomes of fuel/year or 6.3% of world refinery production (Nygren, Aleklett & Hoeoek 2009). Tourism, in particular international tourism, therefore relies heavily on the consumption of oil. Aside from transport, construction for tourism purposes is another high user of fossil fuels.

The relationship between peak oil and tourism, however, is not well-researched despite fossil fuels being vitally important for the very oil intensive tourism industry (Becken 2006; 2010). In the foreseeable future, demand will outstrip the supply of oil or at least cheap oil, therefore creating enormous problems for the globally growing and important tourism industry, destinations and societies.

Within a 60 year period the number of international tourist numbers increased from 25 million in 1950 to 935 million in 2010. It is expected that this number will grow to 1.6 billion by the year 2020 (United Nations World Tourism Organisation 2011). Moreover, IPK International (2011) estimates that humans took 9.8 billion global domestic and outbound trips.

Travelling is still very much a privilege of the rich in the developed world who are already over-using a number of available resources. This will have to change, in particular as there are more and more people from developing countries ‘joining’ in on the pleasure of experiencing a holiday – or economically poorer groups of the global society will be squeezed out of the travel market by rising costs.

Tourists, the tourism industry and destinations will have to change to adjust to the situation where oil becomes more expensive. However, research on the topic is very limited and tourism forecasts rarely consider price hikes or oil shortages as an important factor (Becken 2010).

In summary, the impact of less affordable oil is complex and difficult to assess, but it appears that an interdisciplinary approach to understand the many dimensions of the relationship between oil and tourism is essential in order to be able to manage the associated risk – especially for highly transport dependent long-haul destinations like Australia in general, and Tasmania in particular.

References:
New Zealand researcher Susanne Becken has studied the link between peak oil and tourism at great length. Click the link for a list of her studies.
Fuelling Tourism
Susanne Becken slide presentation
Environment-friendly Tourists: What Do We Really Know About Them?
Tourism and climate change: risks and opportunities

(Dirk Reiser is researcher at the University of Tasmania specialising in recreation and related issues. He is also on the Board of Directors of Sustainable Living Tasmania.)

by Chris Harries

How will oil depletion affect the Tasmanian economy? Which industry sectors would be most exposed? What can be done to build resilience into vulnerable sectors? Are there opportunities for economic growth in a post carbon future? How can the state economy be geared to help protect the livelihoods of the Tasmanian people?

The short answer to all these questions is that we don’t know. Significant modelling studies would have to be undertaken to provide the necessary data to understand all the implications.

What we do know is that our economy is critically oil dependent. We produce no liquid fuels and import all that we use. If oil prices rise there will be a significant cost burden to the entire economy and to individual sectors.

Most exposed will be those sectors that are utterly dependent on oil – that is, those that rely on significant imports and exports of goods, those that have high fossil fuel inputs and those that rely on the movement of people. We could point specifically to agriculture, freight and tourism industries, but all sectors would be implicated in so many ways.

A comprehensive understanding of all such factors is required in order for responsive action to be taken but that should not stop decision makers from taking obvious steps to help build resilience into our state economy.

In the longer term, it will be necessary to foreshadow how the whole world economy will inexorably change in the aftermath of oil decline, because our own economy will be forced to adjust accordingly.

Relocalisation
What does seem certain is that much of the thrust towards a globalised economy will retreat to some extent, as long distance transport costs may become prohibitive, and this may then alter the economics of local production. We may even see some restoration of localised production – especially of agricultural produce and some manufacturing – that has been whittled away during the past three decades.

Building resilience into the economy will have the spin-off effect of building resilience into the Tasmanian community. Being almost totally reliant on a fragile world economy will not be healthy. Goods and services that we rely on for our sustenance and livelihoods should be, as far as practicable, produced locally. There are inspirational efforts already being made in many areas of Tasmania to that end.

The Tasmanian government’s Oil Price Vulnerability Study will help to establish an information base that can answer some of the pertinent questions at the head of this page, but it is in the interest of all citizens and businesses not to sit and wait for government action, there are many steps that can be taken now to build opportunities and minimise risk.

(Chris Harries is a long term advocate for sustainability and social justice policies. He is an active member of the Peak Oil Tasmania working group.)

© 2011 Peak Oil Tasmania Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha